ارزشیابی کیفیت محتوای الکترونیکی از منظر دانشجویان دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس‎ارشد برنامه‌ریزی درسی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

2 دانشیار دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش، ارزیابی کیفیت محتوای الکترونیکی از دیدگاه دانشجویان دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد بود. روش پژوهش، توصیفی مقطعی بود. جامعه آماری، دانشجویان دوره‌ های آموزش الکترونیکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد بودند که با استفاده از نمونه‌گیری طبقه‌ ای نسبتی، از بین آنها، نمونهای به حجم 250 نفر انتخاب شد. ابزار جمع‌آوری اطلاعات، پرسش‌نامه محقق‌ساخته ارزیابی کیفیت فرآیند تولید محتوای الکترونیکی بود. به منظور تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها از آمار توصیفی (میانگین و انحراف معیار) و آمار استنباطی (آزمون t، آنوا و مانووا) استفاده شد. نتایج آزمون تی تک نمونه‌ای نشان داد که میانگین کل مقیاس کیفیت محتوای الکترونیکی و مؤلفه ‌های آن (دسترسی، سازمان‌دهی، صفحه آرایی، منابع، زبان و ارزیابی) در نمونه مورد نظر از میانگین نظری بیشتر می‌باشد. نتایج آزمون تی مستقل و مانوا بیانگر عدم تفاوت معنادار بین میانگین کل مقیاس کیفیت محتوای الکترونیکی و مؤلفه‌ های آن بر حسب جنسیت بود. نتایج آزمون آنوا و مانووا نیز نشان‌دهنده تفاوت معنادار بین میانگین کل مقیاس محتوای الکترونیکی و مؤلفه‌ های آن در دانشجویان رشته ‌های مختلف بود. در مجموع میتوان گفت کیفیت محتوای ارایه شده در دوره ‌های آموزش الکترونیکی از منظر دانشجویان دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد از وضعیت نسبتاً مطلوبی برخوردار می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluating the Quality of E-Content from Viewpoints of Students of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahvash Kazemi Gharajeh 1
  • Maghsoud Amin Khandaghi 2
1 M.A. Graduate in Curriculum Planning, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran
چکیده [English]

The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of e-content from students' viewpoints of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. The study was a descriptive cross-sectional survey. The statistical population was students in e-learning courses of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, among whom a number of 250 students were selected based on stratified sampling method. Data collection instrument was the quality assessment of e-content production process questionnaire. In order to analyze the data, descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistics (t test, ANOVA and MANOVA) were used. One sample t test results showed that the mean scale of quality of electronic content and its components, (access, organizing, layout, resources, language and evaluation) in the sample was more than assumed. The results of t test and MANOVA showed no significant difference between the mean scale of electronic content quality and the quality of its components with respect to gender. MANOVA and ANOVA results also showed a significant difference between the mean scale of electronic content and its components in students of different fields of study. In general, it can be said that the quality of e-learning course content from views of students majoring in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences was relatively adequate.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • e-content
  • e-learning
  • Attitude
  • Curriculum
  1. Abdous, M. (2009). E-learning quality assurance: A process-oriented lifecycle model. Quality Assurance in Education, 17(3), 281-295.
  2. Akbari Burng, M., Jafari Sani, H., Ahanchian, M. R., & Kareshky, H. (2012). Assess the quality of e-learning in Iranian universities based on the orientation of the curriculum and experienced instructors. Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 66, 75-97. (in Persian).
  3. Alavi, S. H., & Shariati, M. (2010). Investigating employees satisfaction with e-learning courses in Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 10(3), 200-210. (in Persian).
  4. Amynayi, N., Zaman Zadeh, W., & Fathi Azar, E. (2010). E-learning and professional socialization of students, challenges and solutions. Third National Conference of Applying E-Learning in Medical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, 16-17 Feb. (in Persian).
  5. Borhani, F., Vatan Parast, M., Abas Zade, A., & Seif Al-Dini, R. (2012). The impact of virtual environment training on nursing students' attitudes toward learning and its relation to learning style. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 12(7), 508-517. (in Persian).
  6. Chen, C. M., Liu, C. Y., & Chang, M. H. (2006). Personalized curriculum sequencing utilizing modified item response theory for web-based instruction. Expert Systems with Applications, 30(2), 378-396.
  7. Emami, H., Aghdasi, M., & Asosheh, A. (2009). E-learning in medical education. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 33(2), 102-111. (in Persian).
  8. Gumus, S. (2010). Rapid content production and delivery in e-learning environments: Use of Adobe Presenter, MS PowerPoint, Adobe Connect. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 805-809
  9. Hussin, H., Bunyarit, F., & Hussein, R. (2009). Instructional design and e-learning: Examining learners' perspective in Malaysian institutions of higher learning. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 26(1), 4-19.
  10. Jocar, A., & Khaseh, A. A. (2007). Information resources as one of the support systems in e-learning: A case study, virtual training courses for students at Shiraz University. Research and Planning in Higher Education, (43(1)), 91-116. (in Persian).
  11. Kamalian, A. R., & Fazel, A. (2010). Review the requirements and feasibility of implementing e-learning system. Technology of Education, 4(1). (in Persian).
  12. Karahoca, D., Dulda, Karahoca, A., Yucel, A., Gulluoglu, B., & Arifoglu, E. (2010). Interactive e-content development for vocational and technical education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5842-5849.
  13. Khaseh, A. A., & Karami, N. (2009). Library services, the missing link in the e-learning programs. Book Faslnameh, 82, 132-145. (in Persian).
  14. Khatoony, A., Dehghani, N., Ahmadi, F., & Haqqani, H. (2011). Comparison the effect of different methods of e-learning and traditional education on nurses' knowledge about bird flu. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 11(2), 140-148. (in Persian).
  15. Latifnejad Roodsari, R., Jafari, H., Hosseini, L., & Asflany, A. (2010). Assessment of knowledge and attitudes towards e-learning Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 10(4), 364-373. (in Persian).
  16. Liaw, S. S., Huang, H. M., & Chen, G. D. (2007). Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1066-1080.
  17. Mahdyun, R., Ghahremani, M., Farasatkhah, M., & Hosseini Shavun, A. (2011). Dimensions and components of quality assurance in higher education and provide a conceptual model for e-learning. Presented at National Conference and Third International Conference on Learning and e-Learning. (in Persian).
  18. Malekian, F., Narimani, M., & Saheb Jamie, S. (2010). The role of cognitive and meta-cognitive strategies motivated learners develop ICT-based education system. Curriculum Planning-Knowledge & Research in Education, 25, 21-38. (in Persian).
  19. Mirza Baigi, M. A., Kharrazi, K., & Mousavi, A. (2009). Designing electronic content based on the cognitive development of theoretical humanities with an emphasis in higher education. Curriculum Studies, 3(12), 71-99. (in Persian).
  20. Mirzaei, M., Ahmadi Poor., F., & Azizian, F. (2012). Viewpoints of students of Shahid Sadoughi University of medical sciences towards e-learning in teaching clinical biochemistry. Journal of Medical Education and Development, 7(2), 67-74. (in Persian).
  21. Mohammad Hossein Zadeh, M. (2010). Review the relationship between computer self-efficacy and academic motivation and e-learning courses to students and their satisfaction with the course curriculum. M.A. Thesis in Curriculum Planning, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (in Persian).
  22. Momeni Rad, A., & Ali Abadi, Kh. (2010). Assurance of quality in e-learning using e-learning standards. Journal of Training Strategy, 3(3), 87-92. (in Persian).
  23. Nachmias, R., & Segev, L. (2003). Students' use of content in web-supported academic courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(2), 145-157.
  24. Naghavi, M. A. (2007). Review attitude of teachers and students of e-learning survey on e-learning in universities. Science Humanities, Research and Planning in Higher Education, 43, 157-176. (in Persian).
  25. Nily Ahmedabad, M. R., Maleki, M., & Velayati, E. (2010). Web pages assessment of medical universities in Iran and appropriate strategies in order to improve it. Third National Conference of Applying E-Learning in Medical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, 16-17 Feb. (in Persian).
  26. Safavi, A. A. (2009). Learning from idea to action. Tehran: Researchers in Academic Publishing. (in Persian).
  27. Sakiroglu, U., Cebi, A., Bezir, C., & Akkan, Y. (2009). Views of the instructors through dynamic education content design in web environment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1012-1016.
  28. Seraji, F., Attaran, M., Ali Asgari, M., & Naderi, A. (2008). Providing digital content, with emphasize on the pedagogical aspects. Presented at the National Conference on Training and Information Technology Chamran University, Ahvaz. (in Persian).
  29. Shabani Nia, F., & Mokhtari, V. (2008). Analysis and design of e-learning systems. Tehran: Nashre Khaniran. (in Persian).
  30. Taqi yareh, F., & Siadati, M. (2007). Selection criteria in e-learning content authoring tools. Research and Planning in Higher Education, 43, 75-92. (in Persian).
  31. Tuma, A. (2010). An evaluation of students perceptions and engagement with e-learning components in a campus based university. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(1), 57-68.
  32. Zare Bydky, M., Rajabpour Sanati, A., & Rahmanian Sharif Abad, A. (2011). Design and production of electronic books together, a new model of delivering learning content in medical science. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 9(1), 18-24. (in Persian).
  33. Zolfaghari, M., Sarmady, M. R., Negarandeh, R., Zandi, B., & Ahmadi, F. (2008). Satisfaction survey of nursing & midwifery students and teachers to utilize a combination of e-learning systems. Nursing Research, 3(10-11), 99-109. (in Persian).