ارزیابی سیستم مدیریت یادگیری مرکز آموزش‌های الکترونیکی دانشگاه تهران

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد تکنولوژی آموزشی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار گروه تکنولوژی آموزشی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

سیستم‌های مدیریت یادگیری، برنامه‌های سطح بالای پیچیده تحت وب می‌باشند که در سال‌های اخیر از سوی مراکز بسیاری مورد توجه و استقبال قرار گرفته است. یکی از این جنبه‌ ها که پژوهش حاضر به دنبال آن است، ارزیابی کیفیت این سیستم‌ها در دانشگاه‌های الکترونیکی تهران می ‌باشد. روش‌ پژوهش حاضر، توصیفی پیمایشی است. جامعه آماری این پژوهش را کلیه دانشجویان دانشگاه‌ الکترونیکی تهران در سال 1393 تشکیل می‌ دهند. برای انتخاب نمونه، از روش تصادفی طبقه‌ ای استفاده شد. 143 نفر از دانشجویان الکترونیکی این دانشگاه و 10 نفر از کارشناسان ارشد تکنولوژی آموزشی، به‌عنوان نمونه آماری انتخاب گردیدند. ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها، پرسش‌نامه محقق ساخته‌ است که برای سنجش روایی آن از نظر متخصصان استفاده شد. هم‌چنین، پایایی آن با استفاده از آزمون آلفای کرونباخ برابر با 0/93 به‌دست آمد. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد که بیشترین و کمترین خرده مؤلفه از نظر کارشناسان ارزیاب به ترتیب مربوط به مؤلفه‌های کیفیت فنی (59/60) و کیفیت پاسخ‌گویی (47/70) و از نظر دانشجویان نیز بیشترین خرده مؤلفه کیفیت فنی (62/92) و کمترین خرده مؤلفه (52/21) می‌باشد. به‌طور کلی، نتایج نشان می‌دهد که کیفیت سیستم مدیریت یادگیری در دانشگاه الکترونیکی تهران بر اساس این ارزیابی به‌طور معناداری بالاتر از حد میانگین (نقطه 50%) و پایین‌تر از حد مطلوب (نقطه 75%) است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Learning Management System of e-Learning Center of Tehran University

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sajad Jamshidikia 1
  • Pourandokht Fazelian 2
  • Zohre Khoshneshin 2
1 M.A. Student of Educational Technology, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Educational Technology Department, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Learning Management System are highly complex and under the web programs which in recent year's most educational centers have paid special attention to it. This study investigated one aspect of this system with regards to evaluation of the quality of these systems, in the Tehran Electronic Universities. The descriptive- survey method was used. The statistical population was all students in Tehran Electronic University in 2014. 143 student of Electronic University of Tehran and 10 specialists in instructional technology at the master level, in the university were selected as sample by stratified random sampling method. The researcher made questionnaire was used for gathering the data. The validity of it was approved by specialists. The reliability was calculated by using Cronbach Alpha and was 0.93. The results showed that the highest and lowest sub-components from experts point of view was the technical quality (59.60) and accountability (47.70) and from student’s point of view was evaluating technical quality components (62.92) and evaluating accountability (52.21). In general, the results indicated that the quality of learning administrative systems in Electronic University of Tehran, based on the evaluations, is significantly higher than the mean (50%) and lower than optimal level (75%).

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Learning management systems
  • e-learning
  • distance learning
  • Virtual University
  1. Anderson, T. (2004). Theory and practice of online learning. In Anderson, T. & Elloumi, F., eds. Theory and Practice of Online Learning. Athabasca University.
  2. Babaie, M. (2011). Introduction to e-learning. Tehran: Chapar. (in Persain)
  3. Bazargan, A. (2001). Educational evaluation: Concepts, patterns, operational processes. Tehran: SAMT. (in Persian).
  4. Brandon, H. R. (2002). LMS and LCMS Demystified by Brandon-Hall. Retrieved 2009, from http://www.brandon-all.com/free_resources/lms_and_lcms.shtml
  5. Clark, R. C., & Meyer, R. (2004). Concepts and theories in e-Learning (Translatatin: Khosro Mehdipor Atai). Tehran: Tehran Art Institute Dibagar.
  6. Cooper, R. (2004). E-learning in the word. London: Falmar.
  7. Dadashzadeh, M. R. (2011). Evaluation of e-learning program medical engineering, Amir Kabir University. Master's Thesis, University of Allameh Tabatabaei. (in Persian).
  8. Delavar, A. (2010). Research methods in psychology and education. Tehran: Virayesh. (in Persian).
  9. Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L., & Wager, W. (2008). Principles of instructional design (Translation by Ali-Abadi, Kh.). Tehran: Dana.
  10. Ghanadan, A., & Taheri, E. (2008). A model for the evaluation of e-learning systems. Fifth International Conference on Information and Communications Technology Management. (in Persian).
  11. Golzari, Z., Kiamanesh, A., Ghorchian, N. Gh. & Ghafari, P. (2010). Development and accreditation of a model for internal evaluation of e-learning courses. Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies, 1(1), 160-185. (in Persain).
  12. Hamdi Pour, A. (2010). Evaluation of Medical Sciences Universities web site libraries and provide suggestions for improving them. Health Information Management, 8(2). (in Persian).
  13. Kamkar, P. (2011). Assessment website at Tehran University by implementing
    e-learning based on the Uselearn.
    M.A. Thesis, Allameh Tabatabaei University in Tehran. (in Persian).
  14. Karahoca, D., & Karahoca, A. (2009). Assessing effectiveness of the cognitive abilities and individual differences on e-learning portal usability evaluation. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 1, 368-380.
  15. Khandaghi, H., & Baghani, M. (2010). Comprehensive evaluation in e-learning environment with an overview of the model GPAM_WATA. Second International Conference on e-learning, Amirkabir University of Tehran. (in Persian).
  16. Lee, J. K., & Hwnag, C. Y. (2007). The effects of computer self- efficacy and learning mangment system quality on e-learners satisfaction, desging the future of learning. Greenwich: LAMS Fondation.
  17. Liu, G-Z., Liu, Z-H., & Hwang, G-J. (2007). Developing multi-dimensional evaluation criteria for English learning websites with university students and professors. Computers & Education, 56, 65-79.
  18. Moore, M. (2004). Three types of instruction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
  19. Oztekin, A., Zhenyu, J. K., & Ozgur, U. (2010). UseLearn: A novel checklist and usability evaluation method for eLearning systems by criticality metric analysis. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 40, 455-469.
  20. Pedram, H., Karimzadegan, D., & Asheghi, Zh. (2010). Application of ISO 9126 on quality evaluation of e-learning system in Iran (Case Study: Learning Management System of Amir Kabir University). (in Persian).
  21. Seraji, F. (2007). The impact of new information and communication technologies in education. Proceedings of the Second Conference on Educational Technology, Tehran, Allameh Tabatabaei University Press. (in Persian).
  22. Seyedi Nazarlou, S. T. (2010). Examine how the interaction between the three elements of education (students, faculty and content) curriculum books University of Khaje Nasir Toosi. Master's Thesis, University of Allameh Tabatabaei. (in Persian).
  23. Shee, D. Y., & Wang, Yi-Shun. (2008). Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e-learning system: A methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications. Computers & Education, 50, 894-905.
  24. Tseng, Ming-Lang., Lin, Ru-Jen & Chen, Hui-Ping. (2011). Evaluating the effectiveness of e-learning system in uncertainty. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(6), 869-889.
  25. Zarei Zavaraki, E., Aghigh, K., & Rastegar, K. (2010). Technology assessment and evaluation of e-learning of Khaje Nasir Toosi University of Technology. Journal of Educational Measurement, 18(1), 11-19. (in Persian).